Leo Tolstoy Teaching Is Shielded From People

Look at the whole LEGION of Twitter accounts aligned here, all carry Leo Tolstoy’s name! 5 of them call themselves “Leo Tolstoy”, and 6^th – “Tolstoyans” (nice total number of 6, by the way, – for those of you pros in Gematria, remember what SIX means?)

As a single source for their quotes, as @TolstoySays and @TolstoySaying claim, they use some Tolstoy’s 1909 dubious quotation book “For Every Day” (the name itself stink! is it a toothpaste?). @LeoTolstoy1910 account is likely, judging by its name, based on another quotation book called “Life Path”. Neither of these books are written by Tolstoy himself, they’re merely a parodic extracts from Tolstoy’s real work.

These accounts are firing quotes scheduled automatically every minute. And the quotes they use are empty in meaning, poor in translation and have no spirit in them whatsoever, as you can see for yourself at the screenshots below. Just notice the huge number of tweets, the dozens of thousands!

So what’s wrong with that picture? The reasons why this incessant firing of those empty quotes of dubious origin and quality badly influences the public are:

• The quotes are ripped out of context. They are too short and too general. Therefore, they can be interpreted in many different ways and even can be used AGAINST WHAT TOLSTOY ACTUALLY MEANT.
  For example, one of the most often re-tweeted quote is “Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself” often carries wrong connotation. This can mean anything from “need to work on yourself” to “never interfere with what things are“. In fact, Leo Tolstoy himself never stopped exposing lies and helping others with understanding the reality and, while constantly improving himself, wrote “I write what I write because I know the truth and can’t be silent“.
  To be objective, quotes must provide a reference to the source: book name (not a quotes book but the original Tolstoy’s essay or novel…) and the page number (for example what Kindle provides automatically upon selecting/tweeting a book highlight).
  The short quotations don’t fit Tolstoy’s writing style. Tolstoy wrote simple to understand. He took a narrow topic and clearly elaborated it, filled with examples, and left no space for a false interpretation of the meaning he was passing over.
• The books of quotes of Tolstoy, just like the one called “Life Path” of 1910, are fraudulent (that book includes quotes from authors whose opinions Tolstoy clearly disproved, I’ll elaborate on this in another article (if they don’t shut me up before that, as while I’m writing this I’ve just received a threatening call from CRA, just next day after me exposing these “Leo Tolstoy” Twitter accounts as shills obscuring the truth).
• They create an impression of Leo Tolstoy being annoyingly PUSHED onto people with some attached agenda behind (this concern was confirmed based on conversations with others on Twitter and YouTube).
• They create an impression that Tolstoy has a lot of Disciples, which puts truth loving people into thinking that Tolstoy’s work is in good hands, while in reality we have to be awake to defend the truth about his writings way too often. In fact, these tweeters don’t provide any support nor education in the proper context.
• Money involved: Twitter’s Promotional Add-Ons, Schedulers, Alerts notifying the agents about any mentioning of Tolstoy’s name.
• Number of employees put to work 24×7, people in shifts, involved with various languages, plus Facebook page etc. etc.…
• Most importantly – regardless of the immediate notifications they receive, they stay apathetic from defending Tolstoy’s name. They observed silently from aside how Tolstoy was falsely accused of being a member of Freemasonry secret society (restricted in Russia at his time). And only after me messaging them with a direct request for a support of truth about Tolstoy’s background, they replied, even with irritation and authority of gatekeepers of the truth: “Tolstoy was not a Freemason. Any other questions?” and they enjoyed each other tweet with a “heart”:

  

• Not only they don’t support, but they discourage people from admiring Tolstoy’s work. In our further conversation, they tried to dispirit me in regards to Tolstoy with the following tweet: “Idolatry. Attachment leads to suffering.”
• They impress a false authority with their display names “Leo Tolstoy”.
• They didn’t even read the original Tolstoy’s works. (They couldn’t answer what their favorite book was.) If they did read him – the spirit and answers would be totally different. One needs only to start reading Tolstoy to understand what I’m talking about, it’s that powerful! (I’m guessing those tweeters must even have in their job descriptions requirements so they must not read Tolstoy’s works, to not to get them engaged with this Spirit, to stay shills the way they are!) It’s shocking and sad to observe.
• Finally, they’re clearly plagiarizing Tolstoy while calling themselves his name! They absolutely HAVE NO RIGHT to call themselves anything near worthy of “Leo Tolstoy” name and should immediately rename their accounts!

"Tell me who your friends are, and I'll tell you who you are".

As a result of all the “precautions” taken by the gatekeepers of Tolstoy, they ATTRACTED a lot of GARBAGE followers: empty lost souls speaking foul language and having no intentions in their lives (see screenshots below) – which finally discredit reputation of this highly educated, analytical, fearless, kind, loving, wise, prophetic person Leo Tolstoy! Is this his legacy now, thanks to you?

The behavior of these SIX TWITTER ACCOUNTS, which lead me to realization that they are created by the same organization with the purpose of monitoring interest to Leo Tolstoy’s writings, by confusing and flooding with abstract messages, as I observed was:

• Not engaging in conversations
• Not supportive when help of true Tolstoy followers was necessary
• Automatic, 24×7 bombarding with empty quotes
• When I questioned their identities, they demonstrated intolerance and aggression, attacked me by picking my tweet in which I said “sorry” to someone for being harsh for a moment while trying hard to get people support, – in which case my apology was friendly accepted by the recipient. This exact diminishing behavior by “Tolstoyans” confirmed that they are from Russia with the most certainty, because blaming for an apology (= looking at an honest confession as an “admission of a crime”) is a typical psychological defect in there, caused by the long history of totalitarian ruling.
• They didn’t disprove that they are Russian agents but instead locked me from seeing their tweets. After me three days of me exposing them, they reappeared with a sweet talk trying to blame it all on one of their account and to disassociate the others, when there was an obvious support between them. And they came to me just on the same day when I received the threatening call. What a coincidence!
• They ridicule the translations of Tolstoy’s work, calling them “scholarly translations“, “suffice perfectly fine” for non-Russian speaking audience – displaying arrogant Russian military attitude, while being aware, as I have noticed to my sorrow, that most translations are lacking the original Tolstoy’s spirit and distort the meaning in many cases. Fortunately, regardless of that, God’s spirit is still showing in them, judging by the comments on Amazon.com of people enchanted by the meaning, logic, and soul of Tolstoy:

Tolstoy’s teaching is carefully guarded because it is dangerous for Churches and governments now as before, or even more dangerous now.

Tolstoyans, calling themselves “Disciples” and pretending to spread universal moral principles observed by Leo Tolstoy, have no idea what universal moral principles are. This PROVES with 100% certainty they haven’t even read Tolstoy. Just see below how lost they are. They are definitely not fit to lead people to Tolstoy. And they know that, that’s the point, and their agenda is different.

But we need to move on and even though we cannot make these shills disappear easily, we should:

• Be aware of their intentions and un-follow them.
• Read Tolstoy’s actual books dedicated to spiritually and revealing other truths, instead of looking for a quick satisfaction from quoting him.
• If someone quotes Tolstoy with good intentions of sharing his magical teaching to benefit people, they must provide the source from which the quote is taken, to encourage the reading and let all understand the context and meaning of a quote.